Tuesday, August 4

How to lose your mind in 30 days

Q: What's Nandini been doing all this while after promising to write a fantastically awesome series of posts on feminism?

A: House-hunting. And not writing!

Seriously, this takes a LOT of time. The good news, though, is that I found something lovely that's practically perfect.

New house? Check. (As n00bz we are very ill-equipped to deal with old-house issues.)

Walkable? Check. (Movie theaters a five minute walk away!)

Good schools? Check.

Right-sized? Check. (three bedrooms, great office area, nice finished basement, cute un-overwhelming backyard.)

Good kitchen? Check. (Not fantastic like that other house that got away, but good.)

Hundreds of bathrooms? Check. (Saurabh is not crazy about this feature.)

Ample closet space? Check. (Lovely, deep, big and numerous. Oooh, I could write closet-porn about these closets.)

Fits budget? Um... Retroactively, after upward revision, sort of.

It also has black carpeting which is going to be a PITA come decorating and furniture-buying time, but we'll cross that bridge when we get to it. For the moment more pressing matters occupy my mind, viz., shopping for a bloody mortgage.

Let me take a minute right now to tell you that mortgage brokers are, as a breed, complete SLIMEBALLS. If you have one, administer a heavy tap on the head with a shovel (all homeowners must have a shovel and this is why!) and bury the bugger in your backyard pronto. The fewer of them roam among the unsuspecting public, the better. I just hope your friendly backyard worms don't choke on the poison.

Back to regular programming.

By far the worst thing about mortgages is the rate. It changes, you see, every single day. Worse, the rate isn't really the rate. A lender could be offering you a fantastic rate but then also charge $3 jillion in fees which would effectively make the rate meaningless. In an effort to make this rate thing fairer, the U.S. government requires the disclosure of this creature called the APR, which is the effective mortgage interest rate when lender fees are included. Oh, dandy, I thought, but there was a catch.

APR doesn't include all possible fees the lender could charge. Only "some". Nobody knows which. Except of course the very mortage broker slime who thought up the fees in the first place.

People shopping for a mortgage: the only way around this is to ask your lender for a "good faith estimate" of all closing costs from the lender's end, and calculate the blasted APR yourself.

How, you ask? It's just a couple of simple* formulae. You first calculate the monthly payment using C+E and the original interest rate r = R/1200:


And then from that figure out the APR (a = A/1200) is then calculated iteratively by solving the following equation using the Newton-Raphson method:


(Or do what I did and ask the Lord God Of The Internet.)

Anyway. My adventures in mortgage shopping shall no doubt lend themselves to ever more entertaining stories for the blog (knock on wood... whenever I'm convinced I'm going to be blogging a lot now, surely, I have so many interesting things to say... a flood of stuff just FWOOMPS on my head making blogging impossible). Stay tuned.

*for nontraditional values of "simple".

Read More...

Wednesday, June 17

Yes, Virginia, Sometimes I Admit I'm Wrong.

Last month while reviewing Slumdog Millionaire, I may have expressed certain sentiments and advanced claims that did not have the firmest of foundations in actual verifiable fact.

Alright, alright, I was wrong.

Here's what I said:


Here's a pop quiz for you. Name some good female characters from Hindi movies. By 'good', I mean true characters, people with storylines that belong to them and people who have goals and people who do something about those goals and people who grow during the story or at least prove themselves by the end of it.

OK, that's too hard, I know.



And now that I have been inundated with examples, I realise it isn't too hard at all. So I take that back. There are many examples of great women characters in popular media.

But that doesn't stop making the damsel in distress character offensive. Just because black characters are treated with respect on screen today, doesn't mean the time is ripe to bring back blackface jokes a la Tom & Jerry (Tom gets a blackface as a result of an exploding teapot, etc). Right? Everybody with me on that?

Good.

Read More...

Monday, June 15

My Road To Feminism, Part One: What I Never Understood About Those Shrill Shrews

It has only been a few years, too few, since I began to call myself a feminist. My mother had trained me up to be one since I was a kid, but during my teens - those years when a person's astounding ignorance coincides with absolute conviction - I laboured under the misapprehension that feminists are extremist dykes who have lost touch with reality.

In my defence, I was reading people like Andrea Dworkin, who famously demanded from men twenty-four hours in which there was no rape. Wait, what?* Feminism as a movement has a peculiar (so I thought at the time) obsession with rape. And I don't use the word obsession lightly. I read so very many angry rants, and to my mind the question was: we don't go around ranting that way about murder, do we? What is UP with these people?

But I get it. I finally do. And it was a guy's oh-so-typical response to this post that did it. (You might want to browse through that incredible comment thread, by the way, if you have a few weeks to spare. 2915 and counting!) What this man said was - I'm paraphrasing to condense -

We all know rapists are bad but rapists exist, that's life, so women should avoid putting themselves in situations where bad things could happen to them - if I'm showing off my gold Rolex in a bad part of town, I shouldn't be surprised if it gets stolen from me.

It sounds so simple, so logical, so harmless to most people I'm sure, because I've heard it from so many people all my life... but it made my blood boil.

BOIL.

1. He equates the unchangeable state of being female to a vulgar display of goods that people will naturally want to steal. You've heard the phrase "objectification of women". This is what it means.

2. He wants women to avoid "bad situations" in which they may get assaulted. So women should not drink in men's presence whether at home or in a pub, or go out alone, or travel alone, or share a meal with men, or accept drinks from men, or wear clothes that could possibly be construed as an invitation to rape, or kiss men, etc. If they do, they "shouldn't be surprised" when they are raped. And when women do restrict their lives to the maximum possible extent, when they draw the boundaries around themselves so tight they must crouch in their burqas at the far corners of their husband's homes away from dangerous windows, and their husbands come home and rape them anyway, then what? "It's their culture," is the response, as if women had an equal hand in creating this culture. Or else, worse, "Why did she marry this man?"

So like I said, it made my blood boil, and the feminist rage over rape suddenly started to become understandable.

When somebody is murdered, nobody ever tells the victim he should have known better than to put himself in that bad situation.

Not just rape victims who are blamed for being attacked - any woman who has been sexually harassed or molested hears this too, which is me and every other woman I know (really, 100%, many times each).

That's a very large percentage of men out there who have pinched a few bottoms or made terrifying phone calls to the twelve-year-old girl next door or given a keynote presentation featuring porn at a high-profile tech conference or at the minimum stared at a woman's chest instead of talking to her. We're only ever told to get over it, stop wearing that tight sweater and get on with life. Movies like this one come along to justify many men's filthy habit of raking a woman's body with their eyes: if you're a 40 year old male virgin, you just can't help it, and what's the big deal if you're only looking?

I find the quickest way to enlighten men is to say: imagine you're in a gay bar filled with dudes you just know are "top"s. You're just there to hang out with your friend because this is the only kind of bar around, but every time you look up from your shoes, ten of these big, burly, possibly tattooed creatures are eyeing you with obvious interest, checking out your butt and chest and crotch and everything. Often, they approach you, try to chat you up, dance with you, feel you up.

Do you feel threatened?

Say one of them kissed you forcibly, and when you complain, you're told to loosen up, what's the big deal, get over it, and why are you in a bar if you want to stay "safe". Is that OK?

So this is the story of how I learned to understand where feminism's rape rage was coming from. The moral of the story is not to dismiss something just because I don't understand it.

The corollary to the moral is that I was no less a feminist even when I rejected the rape rage. YOU are no less a feminist even if your instinct is to distance yourself from what is admittedly a lot of vituperative rhetoric. Feminism's heart is bigger and more inclusive than you think.

That's the story for tomorrow.

Read More...

Saturday, May 16

Slumdog: My Verdict

Finally, finally, I saw Slumdog Millionaire. It's barely even watchable. What is all the fuss and Oscarifying about?!

Offence No. 1: It piles one unbelievable thing on top of another, jarring the viewer out of the movie so often it's annoying.

No gameshow host would mock a contestant so much and so openly, inviting the audience to join in the regatta, let alone be the megalomaniac who sets the contestant up to fail. No way Jose. You need a villain, pick somebody else. Somebody who might have a smidgen of believable motivation to hate the protagonist, even. OK?

I could sing a song a million times and still not know who wrote it. Why, I could make a freaking MOVIE where a key plot element hinges on who wrote the song and STILL GET IT WRONG!

The mere experience of having a gun pointed at me does not endow me with the knowledge of who invented guns.

If I am smart enough to reason out that Oxford-Cambridge boat race question, who do I need a lifeline to tell me "Truth Alone Triumphs" is the right answer among such choices as "Money Alone Triumphs" and "Evil Alone Triumphs"?

Who Wants To Be A Millionaire is arguably the most successful and ubiquitous gameshow on earth, and the moviemakers think we don't know how it works? Anil Kapoor ji - Dev Patel will not be "left with nothing" if he answers the final question incorrectly. He'll still have his Rs. 6,40,000. And Danny Boyle saheb - the show is not telecast live, not even to show off Dramatic Moments In The Hero's Quest For True Love.

Offence No. 2: It grosses me out for the sake of grossing me out, and because it's India so there's got to be a scene with shit in it.

NO. Just... NO.

Offence No. 3: ANOTHER bloody damsel in distress archetype has been confused for an actual character worthy of appearing in a movie. And AGAIN, nobody noticed, because these things are not meant to be noticed. AARRGGHH.

Here's a pop quiz for you. Name some good female characters from Hindi movies. By 'good', I mean true characters, people with storylines that belong to them and people who have goals and people who do something about those goals and people who grow during the story or at least prove themselves by the end of it.

OK, that's too hard, I know. Let's make this easier. Name some good female characters from any movie, Hindi or English, but in order to make it not too easy (because Hollywood has a small but non-imaginary number of movies with female leads like Elizabeth or Thelma and Louise) it has to be a secondary character. You know what I'm talking about. I want you to name a female Donkey or a female Dr. Watson.

If you can name three, it'll exceed my expectations, because not even 2% of all movies have good female secondary roles. 70% of *all* female characters are That Hooker In That Bar For The Drug Scene. 10% are Damsels In Distress For The Hero To Rescue. 8% are lead roles. Thank FSM for small favours, I guess.

What this rant basically means is that I am SICK TO DEATH of female characters whose only characteristic is their (alleged) beauty and maybe if the director is feeling generous, their womanly gentleness. Men in movies are strong, cunning, sloppy, funny, henpecked, laconic, quickwitted, unlucky ... colourful. Women get to be (1) vixens, (2) virgins or (3) victims.

I am not ready to forgive this sin being repeated in a movie that won a bajillion Oscars. And that's all I'm going to say about that.

Here are the promised two last paragraphs about completely different things. Day before yesterday, Mr Awakey Pants got thoroughly confused because I offered him *two* little pieces of cheese on my palm. He reached for one and then the other, and then the first again... and then finally he settled for the average of the two, viz., trying to pick up emptry air from the exact *middle* of the two pieces. :)

Last but not least, Manmohan Singh FTW! Suck eggs, Mayawati.

Read More...

Thursday, April 30

So yesterday I saw just about the worst movie ever made - Freaky Chakra - which I refuse to dignify with even a link to the IMDB page. Karma made up for it today as I finished Pop. 1280 by Jim Thompson which is freaking brilliant. Word for word it packs probably the highest WTFness than any other book I've ever read. Isn't black comedy awesome?

A word of warning: the less you read about the book before you read the book, the better.

Read More...

Friday, April 17

So Long, And Thanks For All The Milk

May 2008. The nurse hands me my pink new baby, who is rooting and rubbing his lips in a frantic signal of hunger. But once at the breast, he is clueless. He puckers his lips, darts his tongue around, tries to suck in all the wrong ways. Neither I nor the nurse nor the lactation consultant can get him to latch on right. Finally I give him a bottle of formula, which he immediately and enthusiastically starts sucking from. The nurse looks at me and turns down her lips. "They break your heart, don't they?" she says. I'm just thrilled to watch him eat.

Over the next two days, a string of lactation experts visit my room in the maternity ward, and try their hand at getting this baby to latch. Their diagnosis: he keeps his tongue stuck to the roof of his mouth, which makes it impossible for him to suck. There are exercises already for the two day old baby: I am to push his tongue down with my pinky finger 8-10 times a day and hold it down for a couple of minutes each time. This will get him used to the correct sucking position. In the meantime, I'm using a breast pump and supplementing my meager colostrum with formula. It breaks my heart.

June 2008. The baby has latched on correctly without trouble a grand total of four times in the last month. The rest of the time, I diligently offer him the breast every two hours. For twenty or thirty minutes there is what feels like a battle of wills between me and my little bundle of joy: latch on wrong, latch off, repeat. When he finally gets it right, it's a thrill like no other. He nurses for half an hour, much longer than the milk lasts, and goes into a deep and contented sleep right at the breast. I'm still supplementing with formula about half the time. But exhausted as I am from this relentless schedule of nursing every two hours, it feels like a huge step forward from the hospital when I feared it would never happen.

July 2008. Supply issues. The latching problems and the supplementing have taken their toll. The pediatrician tells me not to worry about it and just keep supplementing with more and more formula, but that doesn't sound right to me... So I read up, and every website and book tells me he's wrong. To jog my milk machines, I'm doing everything everyone tells me. A teaspoon of fenugreek seeds soaked in water four times a day. "Mother's Milk" blessed thistle tea. Nursing every two hours, and pumping inbetween. Oatmeal for breakfast every day. I'm the walking dead. Supply inches up, and the baby, who has now turned into an Awakey Pants, gets one third of his total intake from formula. Every ounce of formula reduced feels like a victory.

August 2008. No more formula. Suck on that, Otherwise-Awesome Pediatrician!

September 2008. Mr Awakey Pants stops taking a bottle altogether. I'm uncertain about this development: it means Saurabh doesn't get to give the baby expressed milk, which he used to do a couple of times a night. Precious extra sleep is an impossibility now. But it feels good and right that finally, we're doing this the way nature intended.

October 2008. Mr Awakey pants has figured out that the milk machine is attached to the same body whose face he sees during playtime. In the middle of nursing he sometimes stops as if surprised, gives me the sweetest gummy smile, and says "goo". My heart pops a fair few seams.

In other news, eating oatmeal every goddamn day is getting to me. And now that I am no longer quite so exhausted, I've begun to question the maniacal zeal of the pro-breastfeeding websites and books. By now I know from personal experience that not all they say is true; that they whitewash the hell out of this experience; that they definitely give formula a very unfair appraisal. When "What To Expect...", the supposed bible of moms everywhere, resorts to blatant scare tactics - for example, when it says that formula leaves rubbery, plasticky curds in the baby's stomach - how can I believe formula is as bad as they suggest?

November 2008. Mr Awakey Pants is 6 months old, and has begun to find the whole world around him not only extremely interesting, but also in constant need of his personal supervision. His nursing sessions have become a test of my patience and pain tolerence: he latches on, drinks a sip, hears a sound somewhere and whips his head around to track its source, then remembers that his milk is waiting, and latches on again. Repeat ad infinitum. By the time he is done, it's almost time for his next meal.

"I'm done with this breastfeeding bullshit! I'm weaning this kid tomorrow!" I yell at Saurabh when he gets home from work.

December 2008. We nurse successfully in public. With a blanket, of course. I'm unreasonably proud I did it, just as I was unreasonably dreading it. Pushing a sated and sleeping baby around the mall in his stroller, shopping feels like fun again. I'm getting my life back.

January 2009. Mr Awakey Pants has become a very active nurser. By now he knows all the tricks - how to make the milk flow faster, how to squeeze out every last fatty trickle of milk, how to keep his nose clear of the breast so he can breathe unimpeded. His cuteness is overpowering. His antics make my milk ducts clog up.

I spend three days in pain, cursing under my breath as he drinks. I'm not insensitive to the irony of the situation: he caused the blockage, and only he can remove it by nursing frequently. Every time he latches on, I vow that the moment he heals me, I'm done with this breastfeeding bullshit. Saurabh holds my hand and listens to my rants.

February 2009. He wants to stand up and drink his milk now. No, he wants to sit sideways. Then he wants to try stretching out on my legs and nurse upside down. Now he wants to nurse while beating his legs against the wall, holding on to me by my hair. OUCH, baby. NO MORE. I'm weaning him right this minute, goddamn it!

March 2009. This article leaves me with tears in my eyes. I recognise the truth of so much in it.

We were raised to expect that co-parenting was an attainable goal. But who were we kidding? Even in the best of marriages, the ... burden shifts, in incremental, mostly unacknowledged ways, onto the woman. Breast-feeding plays a central role in the shift.


When people say that breast-feeding is “free,” I want to hit them with a two-by-four. It's only free if a woman's time is worth nothing.


I know breast is best for the baby. I know formula is the less-than-ideal alternative. If I'm ever crazy enough to have another kid, I will probably breastfeed her, too, for at least as long as I have nursed Mr Awakey Pants - not just because breastmilk is good for her, but also because I've enjoyed this experience overall... the bonding, the games we play while he nurses, the close contact.

But it's impossible to deny the pressure a new mom is under the BREASTFEED OR ELSE. She is told a hundred lies, a million half-truths, ten million exaggerations in order to get her to consider breastfeeding to be the be-all of being a good mother. During those harrowing days when my supply was low, I felt like a *bad mother*. Kellymom.com and "What To Expect" told me stupid, breezy things like "even if you think you have low supply you probably don't" and "low supply issues are easily corrected". They're not.

They tell you breastfeeding is easy because it's natural. It's not.

They tell you breastfeeding is free. It's not.

They tell you breastfeeding is convenient. It's not.

If there's one thing you take back from this post, let this be it: do not be bullied, misled, guilted or tricked into breastfeeding your baby. Do it only if you consider the effort and sacrifices worth it.

April 2009. Mr Awakey Pants is weaned.

The opportunity was too good to waste. I am visiting my parents in Shanghai. Which means my mom is there. My mom's done this a million times - well, at least twice. She'll help me get through Awakey Pants's crying and my weak resolve.

Only, it was so much easier than I expected. He cried for just one hour at night just before bed, and even then he was comforted by my presence. The next morning I offered him a breast just to test him, and he refused it.

My poor baby. My good, good baby.

He misses it, I can tell. Every time I put him down for a nap, he cries because he remembers he used to do something comforting just before going to sleep and now he can't do it. I hold him close and rock him until his eyes close and his whimpering stops. I'll miss nursing. But for now I'm celebrating my freedom.

A song comes to mind, one I heard just a couple of months ago when I watched "Kannathil Mutthamittal", aka "A Peck On The Cheek". It sums up the experience of parenting in a haunting, beautiful lyric set to great music.

It goes like this:

Little flower from God,
What is it that your eyes seek?
You are where life begins,
And you are where the sky ends,
You came like the breeze,
And stayed in my living breath,
O life that seeps and throbs in my chest,
Little flower from God,
What is it that your eyes seek?

You are my kin, just as you are my foe
Blossom of love, thorn in my womb,
Gentle rain, tiny thunder,
The body that is born, and the spirit that leaves,
And life that transcends death.
Little flower from God,
What is it that your eyes seek?

You are my wealth, just as you are my poverty,
The verse I wrote, and the miss-spelled word,
Borrowed light, tears in the dark,
You are my sky, and the wings I lost,
You are the sorrow that I took home to raise.
Little flower from God,
What is it that your eyes seek?

Read More...

Wednesday, April 15

LOL BBC

BBC News on the special treatment given to the Obamas' new dog, Bo:

This sort of attention is something others, like visiting prime ministers and heads of state, can only dream about.

Oh, droll, BBC. Very droll.

(Reference)

Read More...